1.1 Fri 29/10/2021 - 12:00 Reference texts article 223-1 du règlement général de l’AMF Book 1 Recommendation Closing of the 2021 financial statements and financial statements examination work Closing of the 2021…

10 December 2025 ICMA’s guide provides an overview of the Indian repo market, highlighting recent developments and describing the structure and operation of the market, its infrastructure, types of collateral and counterparties, and the legal and regulatory framework.Download the ICMA guide to Asia Repo Markets: India (ICMA Members only)This is the eighth in a series of reports on domestic repo markets that ICMA is publishing as part of its continued commitment to promoting the development of repo markets around the world. Guides to domestic repo markets in China, Japan, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea and Vietnam, were published in 2022 and 2023 (ICMA member login required), and Australia in 2024.ICMA has played a significant role in promoting the international repo market since the 1990s. This includes the development of the Global Master Repurchase Agreement (GMRA), which has become the principal master agreement for cross-border repos globally, as well as for many domestic repo markets, supported by annually updated legal opinions in over 70 jurisdictions (view a full list of jurisdictions covered by the 2025 legal opinions update). 

Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat den Anhang 2 der Verordnung vom 25. Mai 2005 über Massnahmen gegenüber Sudan (SR 946.231.18) geändert.

Sophie Hutcherson has been reappointed as a Non-Executive Director to the FCA Board by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury. Following her reappointment, Sophie will continue to serve on the FCA Board for a second 3-year term to expire 16 April 2029. Her first 3-year term will end on 16 April 2026 before her new term begins.Sophie brings over 30 years’ senior experience in financial services, with previous roles at Wells Fargo, Deutsche Bank UK, and Lehman Brothers. She is a Fellow of the Chartered Association of Certified Accountants and also holds a number of other non-executive roles, all unrelated to her FCA Board position, including directorships at Yacht Fractions Ltd and Bellecapital.Ashley Alder, chair of the FCA said:'I'd like to congratulate Sophie Hutcherson on her reappointment. We will continue to benefit from her wealth of commercial experience and counsel as the Board focuses on delivery of the FCA's strategy.'Lucy Rigby, economic secretary to the Treasury, Lucy Rigby, said:'I am pleased to confirm the reappointment of Sophie Hutcherson to the FCA Board. Sophie’s extensive experience and skills will continue to support the FCA’s important work to reform regulation and support the government’s growth mission.'About the appointment processReappointments are not automatic, and each case is considered on its own merits. Sophie Hutcherson’s reappointment was made in line with the requirements of the Governance Code on Public Appointments.Sophie Hutcherson has confirmed that she has not engaged in any political activity in the last 5 years.

The FSMA has published two new Communications. These are addressed to the various parties concerned by the mandatory continuing professional education for compliance officers: compliance officers, compliance staff at regulated firms, other persons who have passed the compliance officers’ exam, and training institutions.These Communications contain information for the above persons and entities about the scope of the obligation to undertake continuing professional education and about the recognition process for training institutions. These Communications replace Communication FSMA_2018_05 of 8/05/2018.Read more in the following Communications:Communication FSMA_2025_16: Continuing professional education of approved compliance officers and compliance staff (available in French and Dutch only)Communication FSMA_2025_17: Continuing professional education in compliance – Recognition of training institutions (available in French and Dutch only)

Good morning and welcome everyone.  I am delighted to address the eighth meeting of this Forum.When the Forum was established three years ago, the goal was to bring together participants from across Ireland to build a shared approach to understanding and managing the systemic risks that climate change poses, while supporting the orderly transition of households and businesses to the net zero objective that we’re all familiar with. The Forum has come a long way in those three years.  We have established cross-sectoral working groups across risk management, capability building and, most recently, data and disclosures.  The groups have produced a number of reports and facilitated sharing of knowledge and best practice.    In Ireland emissions have fallen by 10 per cent since the Forum first met while emissions from energy are down 28 per cent.  Change is happening – and in some areas it is happening at pace – but we are told that the country is not on track to meet its 2030 targets.  The task of achieving the fundamental and deep-rooted transformation of our economy is still very much in front of us, and I haven’t mentioned the proposed EU targets for 2040 which is 15 years away, less time than the first iPhone is behind us.  The availability of financing for this transition will be a very important determinant for success.In recent years, legal frameworks have been developed to support the transition. However, these frameworks are complex and financial flows to sustainable activities are estimated to be approximately a quarter of what they need to be by 2030.1Financial firms have taken steps to manage climate and environmental sustainability risks. But maturity varies across firms and more is needed to embed risk management in strategic decisions, and to identify opportunities and take action. My remarks today will focus on four areas.  I will:Provide my perspective on climate risk and sustainable finance in Ireland and the EU, and the progress that has been made to dateHighlight the need to ensure climate action remains a priority for the financial sector, and emphasise the Central Bank’s focus on climate risk and sustainable financeExplain the need for a focus on tangible outcomes that support the transition and adaptationEncourage this Forum to continue to promote a collaborative approach to how the financial sector supports the transition and adaptationProgress to dateFirst, to progress.  There has been some progress although the focus and momentum that built around sustainable finance in recent years is slowing as resources are diverted to other topics and priorities perceived to be more urgent, newer, more profitable or more likely to curry favour or less displeasure.Through participation in the G20 this year, I have seen first-hand how changing political priorities have diverted efforts away from addressing climate change.This would not be a problem if we had just discovered that what Nick Stern told us around 20 years ago, and other scientists before and after him, was wrong.  But we haven’t, he wasn’t and they weren’t.We should recognise that the science hasn’t been ignored completely.  We have seen tangible outcomes from worldwide action.  Global greenhouse gas emissions are now projected to be around 12 per cent below 2019 levels in 2035. This compares to a projected increase in emissions of between 20-48 per cent, before the adoption of the Paris Agreement.We are no longer on a trajectory towards the very worst-case scenarios that were once feared.Between 2021 and 2024, assets in sustainable funds2 in Europe have increased from €3.7tn to €9.1tn and have increased as a percentage from 25 per cent to 52 per cent of total fund assets. Green mortgages now make up 40 per cent3 of new lending in the Irish market, and since the launch of Irish Sovereign Green Bonds in 2018, a total of €11.5bn has been allocated to green projects4.However, since this period of expansion we have seen some headwinds to sustainable finance, partly from political pushback but also because some sustainability products appear not to deliver on their claims.  For example, research indicated that one third of sustainable funds studied had exposure to fossil fuel companies, amounting to an investment of €123bn. The incentive for greenwashing remains, which is a somewhat polite way of saying that we need to watch out for snake oil salesmen5.Of course I recognise that the complexity of implementing sustainable finance, such as embedding complex new regulations, processes and systems, and collecting data to understand the risks, has also hampered progress. Sustainable finance needs to move onto a new, mature phase where it is less about statements of commitment and more about action and outcomes.  So how do we get there? First, to state the obvious, we need to build trust in sustainable finance: we need to ensure that products deliver on their promises and finance goes to where it is needed. This will broaden the transition into market segments that have yet to make significant progress. And second, we need to maintain a focus on the management of climate risk, as well as increasing the focus on climate change mitigation and adaptation.Maintaining momentumIn other words, we need to maintain momentum.  The global macroeconomic costs of climate change are material.  Under a scenario consistent with current nationally-determined contributions, the level of global GDP would be 13 per cent lower by 2050.The macroeconomic costs of taking action to reduce greenhouse emissions are much smaller than the costs associated with inaction.  Ongoing analysis within the Bank on options for recycling revenue from carbon taxes also indicates that there are policy choices that can reduce the costs, and enhance the benefits, of that transition.We are already seeing the impacts of more frequent extreme weather events around the world and here at home.  Such events are much more likely as a result of climate change.The world is getting closer to – and in some reports, even crossing – climate tipping points where parts of the Earth’s systems could be pushed into abrupt or irreversible change6.Ultimately, it is because climate change poses risks to these systems – which provide us with food, water, energy and raw materials – that addressing these risks remains a strategic priority for the Bank.With this in mind we recently updated our climate and sustainable finance strategy.  We’re focusing our work programme on three key aspects:Building financial resilience, both at microprudential and macroprudential levelConsistent with our economic advice mandate, informing national climate policy through data, research and even greater collaboration on the macro-financial aspects of climate change and the transition to net zero; andEnabling the financial system to play its role in transition.In relation to building financial resilience, we are continuing to embed climate risk management and supervision of sustainable finance into all aspects of our supervisory work.  As I hope many of you will be aware, I wrote to the chairs and CEOs of all regulated firms in November 2021 setting out the Central Bank’s supervisory expectations in relation to climate issues.  Those expectations haven’t changed.  Firms are expected to:Demonstrate clear ownership of climate risks affecting the firm, and promote a culture that places emphasis on climate and other ESG issuesUnderstand the impact of climate change on their risk profile, and embed it in risk management frameworksUndertake scenario analysis to understand the potential impacts of climate changeDetermine the impact of climate risk (and opportunities) on their risk profile, business strategy and long-term sustainability, which should inform strategic planningBe transparent about what they are doing, including not engaging in greenwashing.We have seen meaningful progress against many of these topics. Financial institutions have enhanced board oversight, gradually incorporating climate factors into their strategies and risk frameworks, and developed scenario analyses and transition plans.However, progress has been uneven, and we have seen that maturity varies across sectors and across firms. Many institutions remain at early stages of quantitative assessment, have limited data availability, or lack the analytical capabilities needed to quantify exposures and model forward-looking climate impacts. There continues to be gaps in data availability, scenario modelling capabilities, and the systematic incorporation of climate change risks. I expect firms to build on the progress they have made.  Regulated firms should continue to build capacity, both in terms of knowledge and data, in order to better understand and manage the risks that climate change poses to their business.  In particular, firms should deepen their understanding of the potential impacts on the long term sustainability of their business model. And regulated firms should continue to deliver sustainable products in a clear and transparent way that meets the needs of investors and consumers. Real world outcomesSo while progress has been made, there is still more work to be done, not least to have a sharper focus on achieving tangible outcomes that support the real economy’s transition away from unsustainable activities.  And in such a transition, it is inevitable that business models will need to change.Transition planning will require long-term thinking through the current cycle. I should also add that I fully support the current efforts in the EU to remove unnecessary complexity from the sustainable finance regulatory framework.  The current framework is complex and presents challenges for financial market participants who want to support the transition.  We do not want to compromise the resilience of the financial sector or reduce important consumer protections but we do need to make a step change here.  I hope that the review of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation will deliver something that is less complex and more user-friendly for investors.Continuing to collaborateFinally, the importance of collaboration. One topic where there is a clear need for collaboration domestically is in relation to the flood insurance protection gap.  The report we published last year pointed out that 1 in 20 households in Ireland had difficulty in accessing flood insurance.  This number is only going to increase as flood events become more frequent and severe.  Not only will it affect the ability of these households to recover after a flood event, it will also have an effect on the wider economy, not least on the availability of mortgages and the wider housing market.There is a lot of work to be done but I am encouraged by initial discussions with the Department of Finance and the insurance industry on this topic. Finally, I hope that we can build on the contributions that this Forum has made in the last three years.  No doubt the Forum will evolve in response to the evolution of external events but in my view it will continue to have the potential to play an important role, particularly as the focus shifts to the practicalities of implementation and delivery of outcomes. By fostering dialogue, sharing knowledge and driving action, the Forum can help ensure that Ireland’s financial system is prepared to meet the challenges and opportunities of the climate transition.ConclusionThe path to net-zero is not linear but its necessity is clear: the costs associated with taking action to tackle climate change are much smaller than the costs associated with inaction. We must recognise that the journey to net-zero is, at its core, a real economy transition. The financial sector’s task is not just to manage the risks on its balance sheets, but to provide the incentives and the funding to ensure that households and businesses make the low-emission choices required to secure our collective future.My call to you is that we commit to staying the course together. This Forum has the potential to be a catalyst for the transition: sharing best practice, identifying data gaps, and taking action to support the wider Irish economy to deliver the real-world outcomes we need. [1] Climate Policy Initiative[2] Assets in Article 8 or Article 9 funds[3] Central Bank of Ireland Climate Observatory [4] The National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA) announces the publication of the Irish Sovereign Green Bond (ISGB) Allocation Report for 2024 and the Impact Report for 2023 [5] New NGO research uncovers massive greenwashing in European ESG funds  [6] The Planetary health check 2025” report, published by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, shows that seven of the nine planetary boundaries have been exceeded.

The European Banking Authority (EBA) today launched a public consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) and Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) concerning material acquisitions, material transfers of assets or liabilities, and mergers and divisions involving credit institutions or (mixed) financial holding companies under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD). The standards are designed to support banking consolidation and deepen EU market integration by clarifying supervisory expectations, reducing regulatory uncertainty and ensuring consistent prudential assessment across the EU. The consultation runs until 5 March 2026.

November 24, Chicago – NFA has ordered Rimar Capital Limited Partnership (Rimar LP), a former NFA Member commodity pool operator located in Netanya, Israel, not to reapply for NFA membership or act as a principal of an NFA Member at any time in the future. NFA also ordered Ryan Philip Gordon, a prior associated person and principal of Rimar LP and former NFA Associate, not to reapply for NFA membership or act as a principal of an NFA Member for two years and to pay a $75,000 fine if he seeks NFA membership or principal status following the two-year period.