Share this page

Payment for orderflow

In this overview we provide you with the most important publications of the last few years on the topic of Payment for Orderflow.


Titel
Content
FromLanguage
Link
Payment for Order Flow And Asset Choice∗
Thomas Ernst and Chester Spatt
06/2022
ENDL
PAYMENT FOR ORDER FLOW AND ASSET CHOICE
Thomas Ernst
Chester S. Spatt
05/2022
EN
DL
DBG response to IOSCO Retail Market Conduct Task Force Report Deutsche Boerse Group05/2022ENDL
Last chance for Member States to support EU citizens as investors and finally ban Payment for Order Flow (PFOF)Better Finance
05/2022
EN
DL
The New Investing Environment for Retail Investors
Better Finance
05/2022
EN
DL
Position Paper on Payment on Orderflow
Better Finance
05/2022
EN
DL
PFOF and zero-commission brokerage
ESMA
04/2022
EN
DL
We support ESMA’s position on PFOF and stand with retail investorsEquiduct
04/2022
EN
DL
Internalized Retail Order Flow: Informed Trading or Liquidity Provision?Yashar H. Barardehi Dan Bernhardt Zhi Da Mitch Warachka04/2022
EN
DL
Payment for order flow: an analysis of the quality of execution
of a zero-commission broker on Spanish stocks
Policy and International Affairs Directorate General03/2022ENDL
REVIEW OF THE MARKETS IN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS REGULATION / MIFID IIBEUC
02/2022
EN
DL
THE MARKET PLAYERS DOING RETAIL TRADING RIGHTOptiver
02/2022
EN
DL
Hype or New Normal? Insights into the motives and behavior of a new generation of investors DIW-ECON
02/2022
EN
DL
RESEARCH PAPER ON DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF “INDUCEMENTS”Better Finance
02/2022
EN
DL
Payment For Order Flow And the Great Missed Opportunity
Hastings Business Law Journal
12/2021
EN
DL
Payment For Order Flow & Market ImplicationsThe Bureau of National Affairs, Inc12/2021
EN
DL
Proposal for an amending Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 as regards [...] prohibiting receiving payments for forwarding client orders
EU
11/2021
EN
DL
Private investors and the emergence of neo-brokers: Does payment for order flow harm private investors? 
Prof. Dr. Steffen Meyer, Dr. Charline Uhr, Prof. Dr. Lutz Johanning
11/2021
ENDL
Payment for Order flow is really the ‘OUTSOURCING'

08/2021
EN
DL
PAYMENT FOR ORDER FLOW
Internalisation, Retail Trading, Trade-Through Protection,
and Implications for Market Structure
CFA Institute


DL
Interactive Brokers - Disclosure PFOF
IBKR
07/2021
EN
DL
ESMA warns firms and investors about risks arising from payment for order flow and from certain practices by “zero-commission brokers”
ESMA
07/2021
EN
DL
The issue of payment for order flow
FESE
05/2021
EN
DL
Enhancing Competition, Transparency, and Resiliency in U.S. Financial Markets
Citadel Securities
05/2021
ENDL
Germany torpedoes "Payment For Order Flow" ban
Finanz-Szene
04/2022
EN
DL
Verbot von Rückvergütungen für die Weiterleitung von Handelsaufträgen
Bundesrat
03/2022
DE
DL
Vorschlag [ ... ] Verbot der Entgegennahme von Zahlungen für die Weiterleitung von KundenaufträgenBundesrat
01/2022
DE
DL
Broker-Dealers and Payment for Order Flow
Congressional Research Service
04/2021
EN
DL
Payment for order flow: an analysis of the quality of execution of a zero-commission broker on Spanish stocks
CNMV
03/2021
EN
DL
The Good, The Bad & The Ugly of Payment for Order Flow
BestEx
Research
03/2021
EN
DL
Payment for Order Flow:
How Wall Street Costs Main Street Investors Billions of Dollars
through Kickbacks and Preferential Routing of Customer Orders
Better Markets
02/2021
EN
DL
How Payment For Order Flow is impacting markets: The Robinhood and Citadel CaseBocconi Students Investment Club02/2020
EN
DL
 The Impact of Zero Commissions on Retail Trading and ExecutionGreenwich Data Analytics
01/2020
EN
DL
Private investors and the emergence of
neo-brokers: Does payment for order flow harm
private investors?
Prof. Dr. Steffen Meyer, Dr. Charline Uhr,Prof. Dr. Lutz Johanning

EN
DL
Payment for Order Flow
FCA
04/2019
EN
DL
PAYMENT FOR ORDER FLOW IN THE UNITED KINGDOMCFA Institute
06/2012
EN
DL
Guidance on the practice of
‘Payment for Order Flow’
FCA
05/2012
EN
DL
The Relationship between Market-making Revenue, Payment for Order Flow,
and Trading Costs for Market Orders
Robert Battalio
02/2000
EN
DL
Das Verbot von Payment for Orderflow ist verfrüht
Börsenzeitung
04/2022
DE
DL
Studie zur Ausführungsqualität an
ausgewählten deutschen Handelsplattformen
BaFin
04/2022
DE
DL
DDV begrüßt Stellungnahme des Bundesrats zu Payment for Order Flow
DDV
03/2022
DE
DL
Was Neo-Broker versprechen - und halten
BaFin
06/2021
DE
DL

Dear CEO-Letter

Payment for Order Flow (PFOF)

FCA12/2017ENDL
Internalisierung und Marktqualität:
Was bringt Xetra Best?*
Erik Theissen
06/2002
DE
DL


The term "payment for order flow" (PFOF) refers to a method of remuneration in which a financial services provider, usually acting as an intermediary, forwards client orders to a trading partner and pays a commission (reimbursement) to the intermediary in return.

This business model is criticised for undermining the principles of best execution, especially in pre- and post-trade where there is no reference market. Consumer protectors also point out that the terms "fee-free trading", "free of charge", "zero fees" used in this context mask the actual facts and must therefore be questioned from the perspective of MaComp. Even if the customer does not see any fees on his securities statement, this does not mean that he had no costs. These are extended analogously to the trading of contracts for difference and foreign exchange by widening the BID/ASK margin ("spread"). If the spread had been widened by 10 cents multiplied by a number of shares of 1,000, a fee of €100 would have arithmetically been incurred.


The American supervisory authority SEC is considering a ban on this business model. The issue is also being hotly debated at the EU level. If regulatory sanctions are imposed, as is currently being rumoured, the high-flyers of the Corona boom years will soon be allowed to occupy the top positions on the death lists.

DDH+TinyURL: ddh.plus/en/pfof